Israeli Private Companies and Their Alignment to Israeli Intelligence
If the relationship between Israeli Private Companies and Israeli Intelligence is so close, and if they are so dependent on the information given by these security and intelligence services, why are they still private companies?
This is the issue of inner information classification. All security and intelligence organizations are very concerned with information classification. That is why not every Joe (like me) has the permission to enter this system.
You need to possess a series of characteristics to be trusted and given permission to work inside such organizations. For instance, in Iran, you should have religious principles and your family should be among martyrs, veterans etc. In the Zionist Regime, you probably need to be a Jew and believe in Zionism and Israel, not to mention that after getting inside the system, you will be under 100-Percent scrutiny. Most people do not accept such conditions.
This significantly decreases the work performance, and the full potential of the country will never be realized. For instance, there are a lot of experts and engineers in the Zionist Regime, who are not necessarily interested in this country and its stories. The only thing that matters to them is the money and the work they do.
Therefore, to use the full potential, without risking information leaking, the intelligent officers of these organizations receive some of the projects of these organizations in the form of private companies. These people work on projects by entering these companies.
There are a lot of reasons for which the security and intelligence organizations in the world function this way. One of the most important reasons is the use of the full potential of talents within a country with any ideology and attitude. However, the top-rank managers are always an intelligence officer or an individual related to those organizations.
This is my conclusion about such companies. The managers of many of major global cybersecurity companies have previously worked as security officers e.g. Imperva, FireEye, and Palo Alto.
- Iranian blogger
Commentary on Israeli Cyber Power – In Their (Iranian words)
این ویدیو را مشاهده کنید و به قدرت سایبری رژیم صهیونیستی پی ببرید. در این ویدیو که در حقیقت یک مستند است، نشان داده می شود سطح توان سایبری رژیم صهیونیستی در چه حدی می باشد. در این ویدیو زی لاوی مدیر Arilou توضیح می دهد که چرا تمامی سامانه های مدرن قابل هک شدن هستند، از قبیل حتی ماشین های هوشمند و جدیدی که وارد زندگی روزمره انسان ها شدند.
Watch this video and understand the cyber power of Zionist Regime! This video is actually a documentary, showing the cyber potential of the Zionist Regime. Ze Lavey, the manager of Arilou, explains why all modern media could be hacked, even smart and new machines that have become a part of the routine lives of people.
قبلا برای ترور و کشتن شخصی باید ترمز رو می بریدن و از این دست کارها، الان کافیه ماشین طرف رو هک کنی و ترمز رو از کار بندازی و بوم، طرف بره زیر یک تریلی و تمام. خلاصه بعد به کنفرانس Cybertech می رود که در تلاویو رژیم صهیونیستی برگزار شده است. در آنجا هم شما مشاهده خواهید کرد که چه خبر است.
In the past, you needed to dismantle the broken system of one’s car to kill him/her. However, now all you need to do is to hack the car and eliminate the brake and boom! The car will have a crash and that’s the end of the story. Then, the video shows the Cybertech Technology Conference held in Tel Aviv. You will come to understand what is going on.
یک جایی هم هست، بنیامین نتانیاهو، نخست وزیر رژیم صهیونیستی می گوید، دو سال پیش بود که هدفی را مشخص کردم. آن هدف این بود که اسرائیل (رژیم صهیونیستی) جزوء 5 قدرت سایبری جهان شود. حال این هدف، تحقق پیدا کرده است.
At another point, Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli PM, states “that two years ago, I set a goal”. The goal was to make Israel Regime among the top 5 cyber superpowers of the world. Now, this goal is realized.
البته راست هم می گوید، در این 20 سال اخیر رژیم صهیونیستی در تمامی بخش های صنعتی روی لبه پیشرفت های عجیب و غریبی داشته است. الان مثلا پروژه اف 35 را بررسی می کنید، تمامی کامپوننت های جنگ الکترونیک و راداری و … این جنگنده توسط مهندسین و شرکت های بخش خصوصی اسرائیلی طراحی شده است. یا همین بحث طراحی سلاح های سایبری مانند استاکس نت و اسکادا دراگون و …
Actually, he was right. Over the past 20 years, Zionist Regime has had amazing advances in all sectors of industry. Take F 35 project as an instance. All electronic war and radar components of this aircraft have been developed by Israeli engineers and private companies or cyber weapons such as Stuxnet and SCADA Dragon.
بعد هم که آلون بن داوید کارشناس مسائل دفاعی یک سری توضیحات تکمیلی در مورد بحث قدرت سایبری رژیم صهیونیستی و … می دهد. ایشان می گوید، اسرائیل شرایطی را دارد که به صورت متناوب باید بر روی کشورهای همسایه خود نظارت کند. در ادامه می گوید اسرائیل خیلی وقت پیش بود که متوجه شد وارد جنگ شدن و استفاده از موشک های سنگین می تواند، هزینه های وحشتناکی داشته باشد. بنابرین بهترین پاسخی که به نیاز اسرائیل داده می شد، توان سایبری و نظارت سایبری بود.
In the next part of the video, Allon Bin David, a Defense Expert, further explains the cyber power of the Zionist Regime. He states that “the existing situation makes Israel constantly monitors its neighbor countries”. Then he states that long ago Israel understood that entering a war and using heavy missiles could impose huge expenses, thus the best response to Israel needs is cyber power and cyber monitoring.
بعد ازش پرسیده می شود آیا بخش خصوصی اسرائیل با وزارت خانه های امنیتی اسرائیل ارتباطی دارند (فرزند آنها هستند)؟ در جواب می گوید، کاملا. کل این شرکت های بخش خصوصی امنیت سایبر اسرائیل متکی به دانشی هستند که توسط افراد مختلفی از فورس های امنیتی و اطلاعاتی اسرائیل به آنها ارائه می شوند. بعد هم که واحدهای سایبری و پارک سایبری اسرائیل و سربازهای آن بخش ها پرداخته می شود.
Then, he is asked if the private sector of Israel cooperates with Israel Intelligence Departments (are the private companies their offspring?). He answers “completely”. All private cybersecurity companies of Israel rely on the knowledge provided by different people from the security and intelligence forces of Israel. The video then shows the Israel Cyber Parks and cyber soldiers.
- Iranian Blogger
Is Iran supposed to go to war with the US?
Some people in the Middle East and Washington have decided to start the US War Machine and to solve Iran’s Issue once and for all. Verbal threats have now changed place with “regime change”. They are looking for mechanisms to realize this goal. In addition to objections from China and Russia, many analysists are basically worried about the impending big war in the Middle East. North Korea and Venezuela are other issues the US should deal with, yet Iran is the most probable target for a new war, a war that does not only engage Israel and Saudi Arabia but also Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq. The diplomat Mullah has called it “the mother of all wars”.
Experienced Generals like Mattis, Kelly, and McMaster are not with Trump anymore to warn him about the consequences of such a war. Today, Pompeo and Bolton with their strange skills have more freedom to work. In a resolution, the Democrat National Committee demanded the US return to the nuclear deal. However, everyone knows that Iran is not popular among the strong democrat figures either. There are so many Democrats who look forward to a “once-and-for-all” solution to Iran problem, and no one would stop a potential military attack to Iran. Engle, Menendez, and Cardin even objected to JCPOA in 2015.
There are three potential occasions where Iran-US encounter might happen. The first one is in Syria and Lebanon where Iran has a major presence. This is the reason for Israeli attacks to Iranian forces with a lot of casualties. So far, Iranians have controlled themselves well, but with the reaction of Iranian fundamentalists in the near future, all hell may break loose. The second clash zone is Iraq, which is a place for the US to watch Iran. We need to keep in mind that some blamed Iran for Rocket attacks to Baghdad’s Green Zone and Basra airport. From Pentagon, Bolton asked for an attack plan to retaliate. Now, is it strange to think that the war plan will be implemented in the coming future attacks?
The third zone of conflict is the Persian Gulf where Iran and the US forces have had occasional encounters in the past. One tiny miscalculation is needed to make the world a heaven for warmongers. Last year, Trump was looking for a plan to overcome the threat from Iranian speed boats. He was wondering “why don’t we drown them?” Iranians have been also very active in the Persian Gulf. Just like Iraq in 2003, some are after revealing the hidden relationship between Iran and Al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremists, which may also start a war.
However, from the viewpoint of the allies, the situation has not been favorable. Europeans are not interested to take tough measures against Iran. They were opposed to the US withdrawal from JCPOA, and they have come up with solutions such as INSTEX. Warsaw Conference was held with the goal of forming a coalition to solve the Iranian issue, but it was a real mess. A strong coalition was enough to hear the sound of war louder. This could be the only positive aspect of JCPOA and “trusting the Europeans”. It could be treated as a victory.
On the other hand, the empowerment of Iranian fundamentalists is a gift to Neocons around Trump. It smooths the path to war. Accepting the resignation of Zarif, which was known as Rouhani’s trick to gain more points, could make many happy in Washington. However, we saw that in an interesting move, even General Soleimani even thanked Zarif. This resignation could be an end of the era of peace and the beginning of a more aggressive approach. But, it seems that Iranian politicians are well aware of the gravity of the situation.
Iranians are amongst the wave of threats and challenges from inside and outside. What will happen can only be predicted by fortunetellers, and we should have hope in the wisdom of politicians. But, one can guess that there is a serious political project for the Iranian power structure in the future. I emphasize the importance of Iranian future presidential election.
Persian Economist Channel
Air Defense Missile Systems – S-400 Triumf Air Defense Missile System
In the name of Allah, the most Compassionate and the most Merciful
As mentioned before, we shall touch upon the air defense system in lay terms in this article. We will specifically focus on the S-400 Triumf air defense missile system.
In the first step, the important parameters for designing an air defense system should be determined. The first point is that an air defense system should eliminate dynamic objects in the air.
Such dynamic objects involve a range of aircraft, missiles and LEO satellites. All of them have dynamic movements with high speed, composite materials, etc.
Therefore, to destroy such objects, the air defense system should identify them (using radars) through computing systems, control systems, and engagement radar, and it should finally destroy them by short-range and long-range missiles.
Therefore, generally speaking, an air defense system is comprised of a few components or units. The first unit is a series of radars or on some occasions advanced positioning satellites for identification and estimation of the moving object coordinates. It should also be noted that the movement of these objects can be trajectory, dynamic or nonlinear.
The next unit is computing systems that get the data from radars or satellites and estimate the object coordinates in a specific time point (e.g. 20 m :22 s). They will specify the location of this object with its speed and movement coordinates in a specific time frame.
The next unit is the commanding unit which receives the processed data and decides on the type of missile and its launching coordinates. The command is sent to the missile unit, and the missile system will target and attack the object.
There are a number of approaches to engagement and attack. For instance, a series of systems launch two missiles at once, one for low coordinate and one for high coordinates so that the targeted object is destroyed in either of the two given coordinates. It should be noted that all of these units are connected to each other through a series of wireless connections.
These are very general and basic thoughts about the development of an air defense system. In the next article, we shall consider the Russian S-400 Triumph air defense missile system. We will understand how this system can simultaneously deal with 100 targets and strike a wide range of dynamic objects.
- Iranian Blogger