Just staged emotional pornography for the consumption of bitter, resentful Kremlin audiences.

The so-called International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis, offers a paralyzing display of projection, manufactured hysteria, and weaponized grievance typical of modern Russian information warfare. It screeches with the unmistakable neurosis of Vladimir Putin himself — a greasy, fearful desperation hiding behind pseudo-academic panels of loyalist hacks clumsily parroting his paranoid hallucinations. No amount of threadbare Soviet-style agitprop can stitch together the charred wreckage of lies presented in this document.

From the opening paragraph, the Kremlin reveals its own guilt by accusing others of its crimes. Russian forces have pulverized Mariupol, Grozny, Aleppo, Severodonetsk, Bakhmut, Avdiivka, and countless smaller villages. Russian artillery reduced civilian centers to ash while Russian drones sowed death in kindergartens, hospitals, maternity wards, and churches. The Russian army has specialized in indiscriminate slaughter. Yet in the choking haze of its own propaganda, the Kremlin hacks like Maxim Grigoriev vomit out wild fictions about Ukraine committing mass atrocities in Kurakhovo — a town devastated precisely because Russian forces targeted it for months with rocket and artillery fire from occupied Donetsk.

The parade of “witnesses” in the report reads like a casting call for a low-rent propaganda film. Nearly every testimony slavishly repeats the same laughable motifs: innocent Russian-speaking pensioners, evil Ukrainian snipers, marauding Ukrainian drones, laughing Nazi soldiers shooting civilians for sport, Orthodox churches targeted for destruction simply because they are Russian. The cartoonish construction of villainy betrays the real author: a paranoid, self-pitying Kremlin that still fights the ghosts of Nazi Germany while embodying its very worst impulses.

Putin’s signature pathology — projecting his own crimes onto his enemies — oozes from every fake account. His military doctrine relies on human shields, mass deportations, torture chambers, mass graves, and filtration camps. Russian forces systematically fired on humanitarian corridors during the sieges of Mariupol and Severodonetsk. Russian forces, not Ukrainians, booby-trapped bodies and mined civilian escape routes. Yet the Kremlin shrieks about Kurakhovo as though some B-grade television script can erase hundreds of satellite images, intercepted communications, war crime investigations, and eyewitness accounts proving the Kremlin’s hand soaked in blood.

Notice the endless references to “Ukrainian drones” attacking “Russian people” while simultaneously admitting no presence of Ukrainian soldiers in some areas — a logical impossibility unless one believes that uncrewed drones are flying on their own. The report never provides names of supposed Ukrainian units involved, never specifies the chain of command, and never presents photographs, ballistic analysis, or independent forensic evidence. Just hearsay. Just staged emotional pornography for the consumption of bitter, resentful Kremlin audiences.

Zakharova’s presence at the event only confirms the political intent. When the Foreign Ministry’s Ministry of Screeching Denials sends its most shrill propagandist to bless the proceedings, no sane observer mistakes it for an impartial investigation. Zakharova’s penchant for hysterical tirades, red-faced rants about “Anglo-Saxons,” and vodka-fueled Twitter rages has turned her into a living cartoon of the regime’s bottomless insecurity. Her performance here merely compounds the farce.

The psychological sickness of Putin bleeds through most clearly in the repeated invocation of “Russian speakers” as perpetual victims. The Kremlin cannot imagine a Ukraine that is independent, diverse, and sovereign, because the very idea humiliates the twisted historical mythos Putin worships. Therefore, any Russian speaker outside Russian control becomes a tortured soul held hostage by “Nazis.” The myth infantilizes millions of Ukrainians, treats them as voiceless subjects to be “liberated” by tanks, missiles, and mass graves, and licenses the endless slaughter Putin demands to feed his fantasies of restored empire.

At its core, the document reveals not Ukrainian guilt but Russian terror: terror of irrelevance, terror of failure, terror of the Russian people someday realizing that their sons and brothers died not fighting Nazis, but murdering neighbors. The Kremlin, so terrified of truth, stages grotesque theater to paper over the abyss opening beneath its own feet.

Putin’s neurotic fingerprints mark every line of this grotesque production. The obsessive invocation of World War II imagery, the slavish elevation of Soviet nostalgia, the paranoid depiction of the West as a puppet master behind every Ukrainian breath — all of it reeks of a mind trapped in the crumbling catacombs of 1945, incapable of living in the modern world without inventing an endless war to justify its existence.

No tribunal convened by the murderers of Bucha, the rapists of Irpin, the obliterators of Mariupol, and the looters of Kherson will ever possess an ounce of moral authority. No fraudulent testimony, no shrieking press conference, no stitched-together compilation of fabricated grievances will erase the simple truth: Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia razed Ukrainian cities. Russia slaughtered civilians. Russia continues to lie, slander, and sow death because it fears above all the collapse of its blood-soaked myth.

The Kurakhovo report stands as a perfect monument to that fear. A sad, frantic confession masquerading as accusation. An unintentional self-indictment screamed into the void by a regime rotting from the inside out.

Would you like me to create a table summarizing the logical fallacies, propaganda techniques, and psychological indicators of projection and deflection found in the document for easier reference?

The so-called Kurakhovo “report” demonstrates a grotesque overreliance on projection, where Russian operatives accuse Ukraine of actions that mirror Russia’s documented crimes. Every major crime Russia committed — mass shootings of civilians, destruction of churches, deliberate attacks on hospitals, the use of human shields, drone attacks against civilians — is falsely pinned on Ukraine without evidence beyond hearsay.

The document indulges in emotional manipulation, manufacturing endless sob stories that are internally repetitive, each layered with cartoonishly evil caricatures of Ukrainian soldiers. None of the stories present independent verification, photographic proof, medical reports, or forensic evidence. In contrast, Russian war crimes across Ukraine have been meticulously documented by journalists, satellite imagery, international observers, and survivor testimony under oath.

The “tribunal” exposes methodical narrative laundering by parading Russian state officials, “historians,” and “public figures” as impartial investigators when all participants are Kremlin-affiliated mouthpieces with vested interests. No third-party, non-Russian entity reviews, verifies, or endorses the findings.

The testimony collection timeline claims spontaneous, mass recollection of atrocities by residents immediately after Russian occupation, conveniently omitting the well-documented Russian filtration camps, summary executions, and repression mechanisms used to terrorize civilian populations into repeating Moscow-approved scripts.

Psychological projection permeates the report by constantly referring to “forced Ukrainianization” even as Moscow simultaneously banned Ukrainian language education, shuttered Ukrainian churches, abducted mayors, and instituted Russification programs throughout occupied territories like Melitopol, Mariupol, and Kherson.

The neurosis of Putin’s regime leaks through its paranoia about “Russian-speaking” populations being somehow uniquely endangered when, in reality, most Ukrainian soldiers and civilians defending Ukraine against Russia’s invasion are themselves native Russian speakers. Putin weaponizes linguistic identity as a justification for slaughter while pretending to “protect” those he targets.

The Kremlin’s information operatives use fabricated martyrdom narratives, with each “victim” bizarrely expressing unprompted, slavish loyalty to Russia, even pre-war, further indicating script writing rather than organic testimony. No mention ever appears of civilians who resisted Russian occupation or who simply wanted peace without foreign domination, which betrays the monolithic propaganda intent.

Logical fallacies fill the document, most notably false equivalence and circular reasoning. Russian violence and Ukrainian self-defense are equated morally by accusing the victim of being the aggressor. Every claim that Ukrainians shelled their own cities or civilians lacks any tactical, strategic, or even remotely plausible military explanation, yet the report recycles these fantasies as though sheer repetition will grant them credibility.

The document depends heavily on anachronistic Soviet myths, constantly invoking World War II, “Nazis,” and “fascists” as the ever-present enemy. This reveals the historical trauma Putin manipulates, where Russia’s wartime sacrifices are weaponized into a perpetual license for new wars, regardless of the victims’ actual political views, language, or ethnicity.

Cognitive dissonance flashes brightly throughout the document, especially when it claims that Ukrainian forces destroyed their own power stations, hospitals, and water supplies while defending cities they held, a behavior that defies even the most basic tactical common sense. The only actor in the war documented to have systematically destroyed civilian infrastructure as an offensive strategy is Russia itself.

Zakharova’s presence poisons the entire event further, as she acts internationally recognized as a Ministry of Foreign Affairs “attack dog,” incapable of objectivity, prone to public tantrums, disinformation, and frothing anti-Western diatribes. Her endorsement signals that the entire report exists purely for disinformation warfare, not truth-seeking.

The report saturates every line with fear, bitterness, and vengeful fantasy, exposing the Kremlin’s panic that Ukraine’s survival represents the irreversible collapse of Putin’s imperial project. That collapse haunts the narrative more than any purported concern for civilians, children, or cultural sites.

No legitimate international legal body would accept anonymous, unverifiable, or coerced testimonies collected in a war zone under the control of the occupying force accused of atrocities. Moscow’s grotesque theatre show replaces independent investigations with state-manufactured sob stories designed to whip up genocidal hatred against Ukrainians while distracting from the Russian Federation’s massive violations of international law.

The Kurakhovo report represents not a legal proceeding but a propaganda séance, a ritual invocation of victimhood by a regime whose hands drip with the blood of the very civilians it pretends to mourn.