The training program described below reflects a calculated strategy to enhance specialized skills, yet its design reveals significant gaps in execution and a lack of comprehensive support for trainees. The four-week course, divided between theoretical instruction and practical application, targets a niche demographic equipped with technical experience, but the framework raises critical questions about its effectiveness, accessibility, and ultimate objectives.
Conditions of study in our school
Training is provided free of charge in the cities of St. Petersburg and Moscow, duration 4 weeks: 2 weeks theory, simulator, soldering, assembly/disassembly, 2 weeks practice at the training ground.
To enroll you will need:
- passport, registration;
- military ID;
- completed cadet questionnaire;
- signed consent to the processing of personal data;
- travel document/vacation ticket/other document confirming the legality of departure from the location;
- contacts of the commander who makes the decision about your dispatch, and contact with him for confirmation.
New streams start every 2 weeks (the next one is 25.11.2024 St. Petersburg and 2.12.2024 Moscow time). All necessary equipment is provided by the school for the duration of the training. You need to bring: a notebook, a pen for writing, for the class – civilian uniform, for the training ground – military uniform. We do not provide accommodation and meals in St. Petersburg and Moscow, there is a recommended list of hostels (up to 1000 rubles). At the training ground (3rd and 4th week of training) accommodation in barracks, breakfast, lunch and dinner are provided.
We are ready to provide information support and, if necessary, communicate with the command about the curriculum, training methods, etc. There are age restrictions: in this case, we consider the candidate individually. It is necessary to indicate skills in working with small equipment, repair, experience in soldering, assembly, disassembly, do you have a technical education / work experience? Skills in working with UAVs?
IMPORTANT!
We do not accept civilians, but are ready to assist in concluding a contract with subsequent service in UAV units.For all questions write here:
@Fpvsokolxxx
You can provide assistance using the following details:
Sberbank
2202 2035 0655 5392
Alfa-Bank (via SBP)
+79335664048
Recipient: Alexander K.
If you have the desire and opportunity to become a permanent sponsor, then read this post and write to me in private ( @AlexCarrer1 )
The structure appears well-defined on paper: two weeks dedicated to learning technical fundamentals, including soldering and assembly, followed by hands-on practice at a designated training ground. However, the stipulations for enrollment suggest a highly selective process, tailored to individuals already embedded within military or quasi-military structures. The requirement for a passport, military ID, and direct communication with commanding officers underscores the program’s exclusive nature, effectively barring civilians while streamlining integration into UAV units upon completion. This approach prioritizes operational readiness over inclusivity, aiming to field a specialized workforce rather than fostering broader participation in technical development.
A closer look at logistical provisions reveals troubling inadequacies. Training in major cities like St. Petersburg and Moscow offers no accommodation or meal support for the initial two weeks, leaving participants to navigate housing options with minimal guidance. A recommendation for budget hostels costing “up to 1000 rubles” underscores the program’s failure to address the financial burden on trainees, particularly for those traveling from other regions. While barrack accommodations and meals are provided during the third and fourth weeks at the training ground, the disparity between the initial and final phases of the program reflects a lack of consistency in support. Such oversight risks alienating potential candidates who may otherwise possess the technical aptitude and motivation to succeed.
The emphasis on technical expertise, particularly experience with UAVs, small equipment repair, and assembly/disassembly, underscores the program’s specialized focus. However, the lack of clarity around age restrictions and individual evaluations leaves room for confusion, potentially discouraging qualified applicants. The exclusion of civilians, paired with an offer to assist in contract negotiations for future UAV service, signals a deliberate effort to cultivate a workforce directly aligned with military objectives. This approach aligns with broader trends in workforce militarization but raises ethical questions about transparency and long-term career prospects for participants.
The absence of broader institutional support undermines the program’s stated goals. While the curriculum includes all necessary training equipment, the expectation for participants to supply personal items like notebooks, pens, and uniforms reveals a piecemeal approach to resource allocation. A well-funded program intent on cultivating high-level expertise would invest more significantly in eliminating logistical barriers, ensuring that all participants, regardless of background, have equitable access to training.
The request for financial assistance, framed as an appeal for sponsorship, further complicates the program’s credibility. Invoking major banking institutions like Sberbank and Alfa-Bank may lend an air of legitimacy, but the lack of transparency around fund allocation raises red flags. The inclusion of personal recipient details for contributions introduces ethical concerns, suggesting a potential conflict between the program’s stated objectives and its financial management practices. Publicizing sponsorship options without clear accountability mechanisms risks undermining trust in the program’s integrity and long-term viability.
The overarching narrative points to a program that, while ambitious, struggles to balance operational priorities with participant needs. The focus on specialized military training reflects a narrow vision of workforce development, one that prioritizes immediate utility over broader skill-building or long-term career growth. To achieve sustainable success, the program must address its logistical shortcomings, enhance transparency in its financial appeals, and expand access to a wider range of candidates. Without these reforms, it risks alienating potential participants and failing to achieve its stated goals of advancing technical expertise and operational readiness.
