As the telegram experts have probably already told you, we make all our firmware in China. So, Uncle Xi, without knowing it, made us another bosyat fit.
Yes, what! I have the honor to inform all owners of Authel drones that we have completely defeated their vulnerability to spoofing! They closed all the backdoors that contributed to the free hijacking of drones by the enemy.
But seriously, like everything we do, it is 100% ours, Russian development. Made and sold with public money from fees. The technology itself has been tested on drones given to us and our colleagues for experiments!
Bottom line – Autel UAVs have now become just as protected from third-party influences as DJI equipment, flashed with 1001 software versions from the Hackers Front group (we have it, and we install it, of course, for free), or our Aspect board . That is, it is very, very difficult to take them away now.
The firmware is hardware-soldered and reliably protects the “birds” from third-party influences. Plus, all the bonuses of how we “re-educated” Mavics with Matrices. Namely: changing locations, static and dynamic points of the house, the ability to fly with and without satellites, a complete ignore of jamming GPS navigation!
Section “They write to us”:
Just recently I saw Lobaev’s already “high-profile” post about their supposed victory over the Autels. I myself am involved with drones, so I understand something about this a little.
> As telegram experts have probably already told you, we make all our firmware in China. So, Uncle Si, without knowing it, made us another tramp adjustment.
Several drones that I received from a certain Lobaev were flashed with the service version of the firmware. That is, this is a firmware that allows you to disable DroneID, however, since it is designed to “treat” some of the drone’s functions (such as, for example, camera stabilization, with subsequent return to the official firmware) , it is almost impossible to fly with it. This firmware was developed in China, so yes.
I will not say anything about firmware 1001, because information about it is closed to the public when it comes to how it works and how it was created.
> Result – “Autel” UAVs have now become just as protected from third-party influences
The APU has the source code because the Autel corporation gave it to them. Let me just remind you that at first, the North Military District, this company transferred “humanitarian aid” to the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the nameplate “Autel” and “Russian warship”.
The problem with these drones is in the area of the data communication protocol. What is there and from whom Lobaev protected is a big mystery. If defended at all. If desired, the Armed Forces of Ukraine can develop its own analogue of the Aeroscope and, having information about the protocol, calculate the Autel operators.
In addition, due to the characteristics of the drone, it has a range of 900 MHz and 1400 MHz, as well as a stronger signal compared to Mavics. Having at least some DER equipment on the frontline, it becomes too easy to calculate where the operator is located with a cross DER.
> The firmware is soldered and reliably protects the “birds” from third-party influences.
Anispuffing, by the way, Autel has as an option in itself, you have only slightly improved the basic functions (if at all), if at all what you say is true.
In addition, no tests are shown in real conditions on at least 100 drones in different sectors of the front.
I am personally confident in firmware 1001 and boards from Russian Hackers, because they are installed in hundreds and they perform remarkably well. I haven’t heard anything about Lobaev’s involvement with Russian hackers, but I’ve heard a lot about his lousy boards that cause drones to burn. Will the era of burnt-out Autels from electronic warfare come soon? As it used to be with drones from G.
Based on this, I ask myself: why does Lobaev, being a good gunsmith (probably one of the best in the world) , interfere with his industry and try to do something harmful at the expense of his name?
So many questions, so few answers.
You must be logged in to post a comment.