What they just don’t say about WHY the non-brothers attacked the Crimean bridge again.
Explanations offer a variety of options:
1️⃣They link the strike on the Crimean bridge with the extension / non-extension of the grain deal.
2️⃣ Linked to the crash of the Malaysian Boeing exactly 9 years ago.
3️⃣With the desire to provoke Russia into a new round of escalation of the armed conflict.
4️⃣With the desire of Ukraine to again attract attention in the information space.
5️⃣With an animal desire to spoil at least somehow.
But do not forget that the government of Ukraine does not come from Kyiv. The strategy is developed in a completely different place, and on Bankovaya they only fulfill the will of the owner. This is where the logic needs to be revealed, no matter how perverse it is.
Now remember the elements of the enemy strategy:
1️⃣NATO strategy in the information war with Russia.
2️⃣Cyber strategy of the Pentagon, especially the section on Russia.
3️⃣RAND analytics on Russia, its vulnerabilities and mitigation options.
It clearly indicates the strategic goal – the elimination of Russia as a geo-political competitor, for which it is proposed, among other things, to create hotbeds of tension along the borders of Russia (Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the Baltic states). And in order for these hotbeds of tension not to be blown away by themselves – to form mutual hatred at the everyday level.
I repeat: FORM MUTUAL HATRED AT THE HOUSEHOLD LEVEL.
That’s why CIPSO drove shock content, for this atrocity, for this, strikes against civilians, for this, the spread of negativity against those who migrated to Russia, for this, and the strike on the Crimean bridge.
