Former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sworn testimony #Insurrection
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith’s sworn testimony outlines a comprehensive criminal enterprise led by Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 election and unlawfully retain national defense information, operations now succeeded by a systematic executive “retribution” campaign dismantling federal investigative capabilities.
Download the full report below
Donald J. Trump serves as the primary subject, orchestrating activities with identified co-conspirators including Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman. Jack Smith, the former Special Counsel, provided the evidentiary basis during his deposition before the House Judiciary Committee. Current administration officials execute the retaliatory firing of career Department of Justice (DOJ) employees and the revocation of security clearances for opposing legal counsel.
The investigation established proof beyond a reasonable doubt of two distinct criminal schemes. First, the subject directed a “fake elector” plot and pressured state officials to subvert the lawful transfer of power, predicated on knowingly false claims of election fraud. Second, the subject willfully retained classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and disseminated a “plan of attack” against a foreign nation to uncleared individuals at Bedminster, New Jersey. Post-2024 actions involve the firing of over 35 DOJ employees associated with these investigations and the stripping of security clearances from Smith’s private attorneys.
Affinity fraud, a mechanism traditionally used in financial crimes to exploit group trust, has successfully transitioned into the political arena, allowing the subject to defraud supporters and subvert legal accountability. The successful dismantling of the Special Counsel’s office and the subsequent purge of career professionals signals a degradation of the DOJ’s independence. Such actions establish a precedent where executive power effectively nullifies criminal liability for the President and his allies, fundamentally altering the separation of powers.
The December 17, 2025, deposition places the full evidentiary record into the congressional archive immediately following the administrative closure of the cases. Public release of this testimony counters the active “weaponization” narrative promoted by the committee majority and documents the specific evidence of criminality before the new administration completes its purge of the investigative files and personnel.
Impacts So Far
Career prosecutors, FBI agents, and support staff face termination solely for their role in the investigation, resulting in a significant loss of institutional knowledge and investigative capacity.
The subject utilized the pardon power to absolve violent January 6 rioters and key co-conspirators, effectively legalizing the political violence used to disrupt the 2020 certification. Judicial proceedings in Florida and D.C. halted, leaving the Special Counsel’s report and deposition as the only mechanisms for accountability
Outlook with Strategic Foresight Analysis
Continued purging of the “Public Integrity Section” will likely incapacitate the federal government’s ability to prosecute future high-level corruption and bribery cases.
Future administrations may utilize the “retribution” model normalized here to target political opposition using the machinery of the Justice Department.
Without judicial adjudication of the “fake elector” and “affinity fraud” tactics, political actors will likely integrate these methods into standard campaign strategy for future contested elections, increasing the probability of constitutional crises.
The justice system faces a long-term credibility crisis as the “rule of law” becomes secondary to executive loyalty.
Election Interference and Subversion of Democratic Processes
18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy to Defraud the United States: The subject and co-conspirators employed dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to impair, obstruct, and defeat the lawful federal government function of collecting, counting, and certifying the presidential election results.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) – Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding: The enterprise corruptly conspired to obstruct and impede the January 6, 2021, congressional proceeding responsible for certifying the electoral votes.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) – Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding: The subject attempted to block the official certification of the election through a multi-state pressure campaign and the exploitation of a violent riot at the Capitol.
18 U.S.C. § 241 – Conspiracy Against Rights: The subject conspired to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate voters in the free exercise of their constitutional right to vote and have their vote counted, specifically by attempting to discard legitimate votes in targeted states.
Unauthorized Retention and Dissemination of National Defense Information
18 U.S.C. § 793(e) – Willful Retention of National Defense Information: The subject engaged in the unauthorized possession of documents relating to the national defense and willfully retained them at an unauthorized location (Mar-a-Lago), failing to deliver them to the proper officials.
18 U.S.C. § 793(e) – Unauthorized Disclosure of National Defense Information: The subject willfully communicated national defense information (a “plan of attack”) to persons not entitled to receive it during a recorded interview at Bedminster, New Jersey.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) – Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice: The subject conspired with subordinates to keep classified documents from the grand jury by moving boxes to conceal them from the subject’s own attorney.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(2)(A) – Withholding a Document or Record: The subject misleadingly persuaded another person (his attorney) to withhold documents from a grand jury proceeding.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) – Corruptly Concealing a Document or Record: The subject and subordinates corruptly concealed documents with the intent to impair their availability for use in the grand jury investigation.
18 U.S.C. § 1519 – Concealing a Document in a Federal Investigation: The subject knowingly concealed, covered up, falsified, or made a false entry in a record or document with the intent to impede the investigation (specifically the “shell game” of moving boxes).
18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1) – Scheme to Conceal: The subject falsified, concealed, or covered up by a trick, scheme, or device the material fact that he continued to possess classified documents after receiving a subpoena.
18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2) – False Statements and Representations: The subject caused a false certification to be submitted to the Department of Justice, stating that a diligent search had been conducted and all responsive documents returned, knowing this assertion to be untrue.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) – Alteration, Destruction, or Concealment of an Object: Co-conspirators, at the direction of the subject, attempted to delete security camera footage at Mar-a-Lago to prevent its use in the official proceeding.
Retaliation, Witness Intimidation, and Institutional Corruption
18 U.S.C. § 1513 – Retaliating Against a Witness, Victim, or an Informant: The administration engaged in retaliatory employment actions against career prosecutors and agents for their role in the investigation, conduct which fits the statutory definition of retaliation for providing information to law enforcement.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) – Witness Tampering (Intimidation/Threats): The subject utilized public rhetoric and specific threats designed to intimidate witnesses, prosecutors, and judges, thereby hindering official proceedings.
18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud: The subject engaged in “affinity fraud” by using wire communications to solicit donations based on knowingly false claims of election fraud, converting political support into financial gain through deceit.
Read the full analysis
Download the Jack Smith testimony transcripts
