This morning at approximately 10:45, three Supreme Court judges were attacked in front of the city park near the Palace of Justice in Tehran. The attack claimed the lives of Judge Mohammad Moghiseh, head of Branch 53, and Hojjatoleslam Ali Razini, head of Branch 39. A third judge, Judge Miri, was critically injured and is undergoing treatment at a local hospital. A security guard at the scene also sustained injuries.
The attacker, reportedly a judiciary service member, used a Colt firearm to target the judges and committed suicide shortly after the shooting. The Judiciary Media Center confirmed that the victims were prominent figures in cases involving national security, espionage, and terrorism. Initial investigations indicate the attacker had no known legal disputes with the court and was not a client of its branches.
Following the incident, the court was secured, and emergency services arrived promptly, with multiple ambulances stationed on-site. Authorities have launched an investigation to uncover the attacker’s motives and possible accomplices.
The assassination of three Supreme Court judges in Tehran is a troubling escalation in the targeting of judicial figures involved in critical national security cases. According to reports from Tabnak, the attack occurred at 10:45 AM in front of the city park near the Palace of Justice. Judges Mohammad Moghiseh and Hojjatoleslam Ali Razini were killed, while Judge Miri was critically injured and remains hospitalized. A security guard also sustained injuries. The assailant, described as a judiciary service member, used a Colt firearm and committed suicide immediately after the attack.
The broader implications of this event cannot be understated. The attack not only weakens public confidence in the judiciary’s security but also risks creating a chilling effect among other officials handling high-stakes cases. Judges and other key personnel may feel increasingly vulnerable, which could hinder their ability to perform their duties without fear. Additionally, the public perception of the judiciary’s strength and impartiality may be damaged, further complicating an already delicate national security environment.
The government and judiciary must respond decisively. Investigations should not only focus on identifying possible accomplices but also delve into the attacker’s motives and any affiliations that may have facilitated the attack. Transparency in the investigation process is crucial to maintaining public trust. Long-term, the incident necessitates a rethinking of internal protocols, such as enhanced vetting for judiciary staff, improved physical security measures, and robust emergency response systems.
