With the help of our protesting compatriots who expressed their disgust with the corruption of the system by exposing the manipulation of the system in the stock exchange, at this stage we will disclose the documents sent to us from within the stock exchange organization itself. Join your protesting compatriots in front of the stock exchange and let the sound of this alarm sound to the ears of others
شماره رای: 337
تاریخ صدور رای: 24/09/1398
شماره نامه کمیته رسیدگی به تخلفات: 93508/121 مورخ 24/06/1398
مرجع رسیدگی: هیئت مدیره بورس اوراق بهادار تهران(سهامی عام)
شخص مورد رسیدگی: شرکت مدیریت سرمایه گذاری امید(سهامی عام) به شناسه ملی 10102258090
اسامی مدیران شرکت در زمان وقوع تخلف:
1- جناب آقای غلامرضا زال¬پور، به کدملی 5479715968 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
2- جناب آقای فرزاد امیری، به کدملی 2971099113 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
3- جناب آقای حسنعلی قنبری ممان، به کد ملی 1533829330 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
4- جناب آقای اکبر کشاورزیان، به کد ملی 1381517927 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
5- جناب آقای علی عسکری، به کد ملی 5219462067 (مدیرعامل و عضو هیئت مدیره)
6- جناب آقای مصطفی پرتوافکنان، به کد ملی 3251779605 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
7- جناب آقای حامد هیئت داودیان، به کد ملی 1378931939 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
8- جناب آقای علی خورسندیان، به کد ملی 0042897521 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
9- جناب آقای احمد ابراهیمی، به کد ملی 1282964178 (مدیرعامل و عضو هیئت مدیره)
10- جناب آقای حبیب رضا حدادی سیاهکلی، به کد ملی 2649813210 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
11- جناب آقای بهزاد شیری، به کد ملی 2970677237 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
12- جناب آقای حمیدرضا خطیبی، به کد ملی 4284646559 (عضو هیئت مدیره)
1- نقض ماده 17 دستورالعمل انضباطی ناشران پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران.
2- نقض ماده 240 لایحه اصلاح قسمتی از قانون تجارت.
پیرو گزارش اعلام تخلف شرکت مدیریت سرمایه گذاری امید(سهامی عام) توسط مدیریت نظارت بر ناشران از طریق سامانه سمتا به شماره پیگیری 674568858772، کمیته رسیدگی به تخلفات سازمان با دعوت از مدیرعامل و اعضاء هیئت مدیره شرکت مزبور در تاریخ 13/06/1398 تشکیل جلسه داده و پس از اخذ دفاعیات شخص مورد رسیدگی، تصمیم پیشنهادی خود را طی نامه شماره 93508/121 مورخ 24/06/1398 برای شرکت بورس اوراق بهادار تهران ارسال نموده است. تخلفات انتسابی به شرح ذیل است:
1- افشای حداکثر سود قابل تقسیم در صورت¬های مالی حسابرسی شده سال مالی منتهی به 30/10/1396 بدون توجه به وضعیت نقدینگی و توان پرداخت سود شرکت و بدون لحاظ وجه التزام موضوع یادداشت 1-1-40 صورتهای مالی.
2- عدم پرداخت سود سهام ظرف مدت 8 ماه از تاریخ تصویب مجمع عمومی در مورد سهامدار عمده (بانک سپه) توسط ناشر طبق بند های 12 و 13 گزارش حسابرس مستقل و بازرس قانونی برای سال مالی منتهی به 30/10/1397.
1- طبق یادداشت شماره 1-1-40 صورتهای مالی منتهی به 30/10/96 مبلغ 6460 میلیارد ریال توسط بانک سپه بابت وجه التزام بدهی سود سهام سنواتی از این شرکت مطالبه شده بود که طی نامه های شماره 65868/96 مورخ 6/12/1396 و شماره 6862/96 مورخ 14/12/1396 و ذکر دلایل مقرراتی، مورد پذیرش این شرکت قرار نگرفت و از آنجا که هیئت مدیره این شرکت نیز اعتقادی به مطالبه مبلغ فوق نداشته مراتب در جلسه 29/1/1397 هیئت مدیره بانک سپه مطرح و موضوع کان لم یکن تلقی شد و مقرر شد مطالبات بانک سپه از این شرکت مجدداً مورد رسیدگی اتخاذ تصمیم قرار گیرد. در راستای اجرای ماده 17 دستورالعمل انضباطی ناشران هیئت مدیره شرکت در بند 39 گزارش عملکرد هیئت مدیره برای سال مالی 96 با عنایت به موارد فوق الاشعار تقسیم سود 80 درصدی را به مجمع عمومی عادی پیشنهاد داده بود. بحث وجه التزام بدهی سود سهام سنواتی توسط حسابرس مستقل و بازرس قانونی شرکت در بخش تاکید بر مطالب خاص مرقوم و در مجمع عادی سالیانه مورخ 31/02/1397 بین سهامداران حاضر در جلسه به تفصیل مورد بررسی قرار گرفت . تصمیم¬گیری نهایی در خصوص میزان سود تقسیمی توسط سهامداران حاضر در مجمع صورت می¬گیرد که در مجمع مزبور به ازای هر سهم به مبلغ 280 ریال (معادل 81.4 درصد EPS) توسط سهامداران حاضر در جلسه و با حضور نماینده قانونی آن سازمان مورد تصویب قرار گرفت.
2- بانک سپه ابتدا به دنبال افزایش سرمایه بوده و با وضع مقررات جدید افزایش سرمایه متوقف شده و تا اوایل سال 97 منتفی شدن افزایش سرمایه مشخص نبوده است. افزایش سرمایه از محل سود انباشته به ضرر سهامداران خرد می¬شده است لذا تصمیم بر این شد که سود قابل تقسیم تصویب و نقداً به سهامداران خرد پرداخت شود و هیچ سهامدار خردی از این بابت شکایتی نداشته باشد. اما پس از این که مشخص شد افزایش سرمایه امکان پذیر نیست طبیعی است بانک سپه و سهامداران آن نمی¬پذیرند که سود خود و فرع آن را دریافت نکنند. همه نمایندگان حضور داشتند و تایید کردند. ماحصل تصمیمات در خصوص عدم پرداخت سود به سهامدار عمده، مبلغ جریمه ای است که از این بابت به شرکت تحمیل شده است که اگر این مبلغ را به بانک سپه می¬دادیم و هزینه مالی آن را میگرفتیم 2300 میلیارد تومان می¬شد و الان هیات داوری حدود 1000 میلیارد رای داده است که این هم با محاسبه حداقل سود است فلذا به سهامداران بیش از 1000 میلیارد نفع رسیده است.رای هیئت مدیره بورس
هیئت مدیره بورس اوراق بهادار تهران در خصوص پرونده تخلفاتی شرکت مدیریت سرمایه گذاری امید(سهامی عام) با عنایت به گزارش مدیریت نظارت بر ناشران سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار، گزارش حسابرس مستقل و بازرس قانونی برای سال مالی منتهی به 30/10/1397 و جمیع اوراق و محتویات پرونده با لحاظ دفاعیات شخص مورد رسیدگی و تصمیم پیشنهادی کمیته رسیدگی به تخلفات، به شرح آتی اتخاذ تصمیم نمود: در مورد اتهام نقض ماده 17 دستورالعمل انضباطی ناشران پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، مبنی بر افشای حداکثر سود قابل تقسیم در صورتهای مالی حسابرسی شده بدون توجه به وضعیت نقدینگی و توان پرداخت سود شرکت و بدون لحاظ وجه التزام و جرایم بدهی سود سنواتی شرکت به سهامدار عمده (بانک سپه)، هیئت مدیره بورس با توجه به عدم احراز تخلف از حیث توانایی شرکت در پرداخت سود و نیز اتخاذ تصمیم در این خصوص توسط سهامداران در مجمع آن شرکت، رای بر برائت ناشر و مدیران آن صادر نمود. در خصوص تخلف انتسابی دیگر به شرکت مبنی بر نقض ماده 240 اصلاحیه قانون تجارت از حیث عدم پرداخت سود سهام ظرف موعد مقرر قانونی با توجه به بند 13 گزارش حسابرس مستقل و بازرس قانونی برای سال مالی منتهی به 30/10/1397 و نیز رای قطعی صادره از هیئت داوری بازار اوراق بهادار دایر بر محکومیت شرکت به پرداخت سود سهام سهامدار عمده و خسارت تاخیر تادیه متعلقه، شرکت و مدیران وقت آن را به استناد بند 11 ماده 29 و بند 3 ماده 21 دستورالعمل انضباطی ناشران پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران هرکدام به اخطار کتبی با درج در پرونده محکوم نمود. معهذا در رابطه با تخلف اخیر، نظر به تصدی دو تن از مدیران شرکت، آقایان فرزاد امیری و غلامرضا زال¬پور پس از صدور رای قطعی هیئت داوری و فقدان سمت ایشان در بازه زمانی وقوع تخلف، نامبردگان از این تخلف انتسابی تبرئه می¬گردند.
اين رأي به استناد ماده 35 قانون بازار اوراق بهادار مصوب 1384 ظرف مهلت يكماه از تاريخ ابلاغ، نزد سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار (مديريت پيگيري تخلفات) قابل تجديدنظرخواهي است.
Vote number: 325
Date of voting: 14/07/1398
Letter number of the Committee for Investigation of Violations: 78389/121 dated 04/12/1397
Reference Authority: Board of Directors of Tehran Stock Exchange (Public Joint Stock Company)
Person under investigation: Zahravi Pharmaceutical Company (Public Joint Stock) with national ID 10102328820
Names of company managers at the time of the violation:
1- Dear Mr. Saeed Khoshoei, to National Code 0043358748 (Member of the Board of Directors)
2- Mr. Gholam Hassan Ghahremani Aghdam, national code 1688802436 (member of the board of directors)
3- Mr. Mohammad Reza Siahi Shadbad, national code 5069091867 (member of the board of directors)
4- Dear Mr. Hamidreza Rasekh, to the national code 2991390468 (member of the board of directors)
5- Mr. Behzad Mohit Mafi, to the national code 2754208471 (CEO and member of the board of directors)
1- Violation of part A of Article 3 of the instructions for the time stages of capital increase of companies registered with the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization, approved by the Board of Directors of the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization on 06/28/1695.
2- Violation of part b of Article 3 of the instructions for the time stages of capital increase of companies registered with the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization, approved by the Board of Directors of the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization on 06/28/1695.
Following the report of reporting the violation of Zahravi Pharmaceutical Company (Public Joint Stock Company) by the Primary Market Supervision Management through the Samta system to the follow-up number 454350750962, the Committee for Investigating Violations of the Organization invited the CEO and members of the Board of Directors, on 11/14/1397 Has convened a meeting and after receiving his defense, has sent his proposed decision to the Tehran Stock Exchange Company through letter No. 78389/121 dated 04/12/1397. Attributive violations are as follows:
1- 22-day delay in publishing the explanatory report of the board of directors regarding the capital increase.
2- 10 days delay in publishing the statement of the legal inspector regarding the explanatory report of the board of directors.
1- On 6/18/1397, the capital increase report was approved by the board of directors and was uploaded on 21/06/1397 in Kadal system.
2- The statutory auditor presented his opinion on 31/06/1397, which was disclosed on 07/08/1397 in Kadal system, considering the time symmetry with the weekend.
Stock Exchange Board Vote
Regarding the violations attributed to Zahravi Pharmaceutical Company (Public Joint Stock Company) for violating parts “A” and “B” of Article 3 of the “Instruction on the time stages of capital increase of companies registered with the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization” in connection with delays in publishing the report Justification of the Board of Directors regarding the capital increase and also delay in publishing the statement of the legal inspector of the company regarding the justification report of the Board of Directors, according to the reasons and documents in the file, including the report of the Publishers and Securities Publishers Supervision Department. Violations as well as the defense of the person under investigation, the Board of Directors of Tehran Stock Exchange considered the above violations as certain and certain, but with regard to additional investigations and a report prepared by the Supervisors of Tehran Stock Exchange, which indicates no connection between delays. The issuer and the process of trading its shares are violated in the period, so in terms of discounts in determining the disciplinary penalty in the above directions based on Article 36 and paragraph 2 of Article 21 “Disciplinary Instructions of Publishers Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange” It is each with a written reminder with Issued in the file.
According to Article 35 of the Securities Market Law approved in 2005, this decision can be appealed to the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization (Violation Follow-up Management) within one month from the date of notification.
Agenda: Deciding on the preparation of disciplinary regulations on how to implement Article 35 of the Securities Market Law.
Attendees: Gentlemen: Ali Sahraei, Mahmoud Reza Khajeh Nasiri, Vahid Rajabian.
Mr. Hosseini (Director of Legal Affairs and Contracts) and Ms. Khoshnood (Director of Cash Market Operations)
In order to implement paragraph 5 of the 575th minutes of the Board of Directors of the Stock Exchange and Securities Organization, in accordance with Article 35 of the Securities Market Law, approved in December 2005, the Tehran Stock Exchange Disciplinary Regulations were compiled and the steps for investigating violations from the beginning of receiving violations to Completion of the file and submission to the Secretary of the Rules and Regulations Committee of the Exchange Board as well as the duties of each member related to investigating the violations of persons subject to Article 35 of the Securities Market Law were discussed by the legal management of the Tehran Stock Exchange.
According to the discussions, the disciplinary regulations of Tehran Stock Exchange were approved by the Committee of Rules and Regulations as follows:
Chapter One: Definitions and Terms
Article 1- The terms and abbreviations defined in Article 1 of the Securities Market Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved in December 2005, have been used in the same terms in this regulation. Other terms used in this regulation are defined as follows:
Violation Investigation Office: Violation Investigation Office of the involved persons, which is formed to conduct preliminary investigations of violation cases under the management of legal affairs and contracts in the stock exchange.
Persons covered: According to paragraph 5 of the five hundred and seventy minutes of the Board of Directors of the Exchange and Securities Organization dated 11/02/1398, the persons covered by this regulation are brokers, brokers / traders, marketers, publishers and other members of the stock exchange, managers and Their employees and those under the supervision of the organization who are not members of any of the stock exchanges.
Stock Exchange: Tehran Stock Exchange Company (Public Joint Stock Company).
Violation: Any act or omission that leads to a violation of the rules and the regulations provide for disciplinary action.
Secretariat of the Office: The Secretariat of the Office of Investigation of Violations, which is formed under the said Office to perform the duties subject to Article 3 of this regulation.
Preliminary verdict: The verdict issued by the board of directors of the Tehran Stock Exchange regarding the violation cases subject to Article 35 of the Market Law.
Proposed Opinion: The proposed decision of the Rules and Regulations Committee regarding each case which, if approved by the Board of Directors, will result in the issuance of a preliminary vote.
Investigation system: Electronic system for registering, notifying and following up on violation reports.
Subject of investigation: The person or persons involved whose violations are investigated will be investigated by the Violations Investigation Office and finally reviewed by the Rules and Regulations Committee.
Rules and Regulations Committee: A specialized committee consisting of three elected members of the Board of Directors of the Stock Exchange, which is responsible for investigating violations and submitting a proposal for the final approval of the Board of Directors.
Investigation report: It is a report prepared by the investigator of each case after conducting a preliminary investigation.
Preliminary report: The initial report of the occurrence of the violation is prepared by the reporting authority and is registered in the Secretariat of the Office to start the investigation process.
Final Report: The final opinion of the Office for the Investigation of Violations on the results of the preliminary investigation and the proposal of punishment or acquittal is the subject of the investigation, which is prepared at the end of the investigation and submitted to the Committee on Rules and Regulations.
Reporting authority: It is the deputies and management of the stock exchange or the organization as the only authorities preparing the preliminary report of the violation.
Regulations: All approvals of the legislative authorities of the country as well as the Council of Ministers, council, organization, stock exchange and other competent authorities that the involved persons are required to comply with.
Board of Directors: Board of Directors of Tehran Stock Exchange Company (Public Joint Stock Company).
Chapter Two: Investigative Organizations
Article 2 – The Violations Investigation Office consists of a secretariat and a number of investigators. The head of the department is responsible for overseeing the preliminary investigation process from the beginning of the filing until the final report is submitted to the Rules and Regulations Committee.
Article 3- The duties of the Secretariat of the Office are:
Receive and record preliminary reports and file.
Examining the structural conditions of the received reports and, if necessary, following up on its shortcomings.
Carry out all correspondence within the duties of the office.
Registration of records, documents and votes of violation cases.
Article 4- The investigators will be selected by the introduction of the Managing Director and the approval of the Rules and Regulations Committee and will be responsible for the following tasks:
Conduct preliminary research.
Collect all information, documents and evidence of violations.
Obtain the opinion of an expert or informant if necessary.
Taking statements of the person subject to investigation and reviewing it.
Preparation of research report after completion of research.
Chapter 3: The Process of Investigating Violations
Article 5 – All preliminary reports are submitted only through the reporting authority and after its registration and completion in the Secretariat of the Office, the file will be formed.
Note: After launching the review system, sending reports to the secretariat of the office and following the review process is done only through the mentioned system.
Article 6- After receiving the preliminary report, the Secretariat of the Office shall review its structural conditions within five working days and, if there are any deficiencies, in a correspondence with the reporting authority, shall announce the deficiencies in order to eliminate them.
Article 7- The reporting authority is obliged to take action to eliminate the declared deficiencies within a maximum of seven working days. Otherwise, the case will be returned to the reporting authority by the Secretariat of the Office without any action.
Article 8- Regarding the structure of preliminary reports, it is obligatory to observe the following items:
Violation reference reference profile
Details of the persons subject to the report in a way that removes any ambiguity regarding their identity by mentioning their national number and ID, position and place of residence, duration of responsibility and matching it with the date of the violation.
Mention the exact details of the then managers of the legal entities subject to the report at the time of the violation and at the time of sending the report.
Time or period of violation.
Violated materials of the regulations and their titles.
Description of attribution violations with full mention of the reasons and sending a legible image of the relevant documents to the attached report.
Records of previous reports of misconduct by the person being reported, if possible.
Obtaining a written response from the subject of the report to attribution violations, if necessary, and commenting on them.
Details of the report preparer with signature and date.
Article 9- In case of completing the file, the secretariat of the department will register it by determining a special class and the file will be referred to the investigator by the head of the department to conduct the investigation.
Article 10- After referring the case, the Secretariat, in accordance with the opinion of the person in charge of the investigation, notifies the attributed violations to the person under investigation in order to receive his written answer. The notice must state the following:
Details of the natural or legal person or persons subject to investigation.
Description of attribution violations.
Specify the deadline for sending a written response within ten working days from the date of notification.
Enter the date and place of the research meeting.
Note: The research session is the hearing session of the personal defenses of the subject of the research.
Article 11- Obtaining a written response from the person under investigation in each case to attribution violations is mandatory by sending a notice, but obtaining face-to-face defenses is subject to an investigation meeting at the discretion of the investigator or at the request of the person under investigation. However, failure to send a response to the notice or the absence of the person under investigation in the investigation session will not prevent the investigation and investigation.
Article 12- If the person under investigation is a legal person, his lawyer or legal representative, and if he is a natural person, he or his lawyer can attend the investigation session by presenting a positive legal reason for the position and determining the limits of authority.
Article 13- From the questions and answers presented in the research session, the minutes must be prepared and signed by the person in charge of the research and the person subject to the research.
Article 14- If necessary, the investigator may invite the reporting authority, stock exchange managers or deputies, as well as other informed, expert or expert persons to attend the research session or obtain their opinion through written inquiries in case of need.
Article 15- After the end of the investigation, the person in charge of the investigation will prepare an investigation report, which will contain at least the following points:
Summary of the defenses of the person or persons under investigation.
Research results and inquiries.
Expert comment on attribution violation.
Determining the nature and importance of the violation in terms of: the effects of the violation on the market, costs or damages to the market or investors, type of intentional violation, based on negligence or fault, duration and extent of the violation, extent and prevalence of the violation, determination of persons Real and legal involved in the violation accurately.
Determining the amount of profit or loss incurred as a result of the violation, if possible.
Comments on the behavior of the person under investigation in the following ways: the degree of cooperation with the investigating authority, positive steps to eliminate the effects of the violation, definitive disciplinary records.
Article 16- After receiving the investigation report and reviewing it, the head of the department prepares the final report based on the official opinion of the violations investigation department regarding the case in question, with the consent or disagreement with the opinion of the investigator, and submits his report along with the investigation report. And sends the decision to the Rules and Regulations Committee.
Article 17- The following items must be mentioned and observed in the final report:
File number and reporting date.
Preliminary Reporting Reference Profile.
Accurate identity details and place of residence of the person or persons under investigation and their legal representative or lawyer.
Title of attributive violations by mentioning the date or time period of its occurrence.
Summary of the case file and the personal defenses of the person under investigation.
Records of final conviction of the person under investigation, if any.
Evidence and documentation of attribution or elimination of attribution of violations.
Mention the reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with the investigation report reasonably.
Proposing innocence or punishment by mentioning it in accordance with the regulations.
Article 18- Upon receipt of the final report, the Secretary of the Rules and Regulations Committee shall invite the members of the Committee to hold a meeting and, in the opinion of the Committee, the person or persons under investigation and any person or persons whose statements are heard to discover the truth and make the necessary decision. Be invited to the meeting.
Article 19- The procedure of the Committee of Laws and Regulations will be as follows:
Hearing the final report and the statements of the head of the violation investigation department.
Listen to the statements of the investigator if necessary.
Hear the defense of the person under investigation or his lawyer or legal representative if necessary.
Decide based on the opinion of the majority of the committee members.
Note: A summary of the discussions and decisions of the Rules and Regulations Committee shall be prepared by the Secretary of the Committee and shall be signed by the members present at the meeting.
Article 20- If, in the opinion of the Committee on Laws and Regulations, the conducted investigations are incomplete, the case shall be returned by its secretary to the Violations Investigation Office for completion, so that after completion, it will be sent to the Committee again for decision.
Article 21- In case of completion of the investigation, the committee, based on the majority vote of the members, will announce the proposed opinion, which after its preparation will be sent to the board of directors by the secretary of the committee for a preliminary vote.
Article 22- If the opinion proposed by the committee is based on the innocence or conviction of the person under investigation, the Board of Directors, based on the opinion of the majority of members, shall approve or reject the proposed opinion and issue a preliminary decision.
Article 23- The duties of the Secretary of the Committee on Laws and Regulations are as follows:
Receive all reports submitted by the Violation Investigation Office and plan it in the committee.
Coordinating meetings, inviting committee members and other guests at the discretion of the committee.
Preparing the minutes, obtaining the signatures of the members and sending the proposed opinions of the committee to the secretariat of the board of directors.
Carrying out the steps of compiling the board of directors’ vote and submitting it to the secretariat of the board of directors for notification.
Article 24- In the following cases, with the decision of the Committee on Laws and Regulations and the approval of the Board of Directors, the file is sent to the organization for decision:
If the person under investigation is subject to Article 14 of the Law on the Development of New Financial Instruments and Institutions, in the opinion of the Committee, subject to a fine.
If the disciplinary punishment of the person under investigation is in the opinion of the committee, professional disqualification, revocation or suspension of the establishment and activity license, revocation or suspension of professional certificates.
If, in the discretion of the Committee, the offense is covered by the criminal headings of Chapter Six of the Securities Market Law.
Article 25- The Board of Directors may conduct any investigation that it deems necessary regarding the case in question or request its implementation from the Office for the Investigation of Violations.
Article 26- The initial verdict must be reasoned, justified and documented in accordance with the regulations, and in the issued verdict, its ability to appeal must be specified by mentioning the legal deadline and the appellate authority.
Article 27- After receiving the signature of the initial vote, the Secretariat of the Board of Directors prepares a copy in three copies and sends one copy to the person or persons subject to the vote, one copy to the Secretariat and one copy to the Organization.
Article 28- If the Office for Investigation of Violations during the investigation finds that the continuation of the activities of the persons under investigation during the investigation and before the issuance of a final verdict leads to the continuation of violations or new violations, it shall notify the organization with the approval of the Rules and Regulations Committee. Preventive measures should be taken in accordance with paragraph 8 of Article 7 of the Securities Market Law.
Article 29- Until the launch of the review system, the use of all computer and telecommunication systems such as messenger (e-mail), fax and telephone to conduct correspondence subject to this regulation is unrestricted.
Chapter 4: Impartiality and Conflict of Interest
Article 30- In order to observe the independence of opinion and complete neutrality and to prevent conflicts of interest between the members of the board of directors of the stock exchange and the person or persons subject to the case in the following cases, the member of the board must refrain from commenting on the case. The persons subject to the research can also object in writing to the existence of the following rejections:
If there is a relative or causal relationship up to the third degree of each category between the board member and the person under investigation.
If there is an employment contract between a member of the board of directors and the person or persons subject to investigation at the time of consideration, under any title or position, including employee, consultant, manager, deputy, etc., or if there has been such a contractual relationship during the last six months.
If there is a legal or criminal dispute between a member of the board of directors, parents, spouse or child and the person under investigation or his / her parents, spouse or child, or in the past, and more than two years from the date of final decision Has not passed.
If the legal entity that is a member of the board of directors has significant control or influence over the legal entity under investigation, or vice versa.
Note: The above prohibitions include both the legal members of the board of directors and their real representatives in the board of directors.
Article 31- In the event of one of the reasons for rejection provided for in Article 30, the member of the Board of Directors must notify the Committee on Laws and Regulations or the Board of Directors, as the case may be, before the commencement of the proceedings. In this case, the said member does not have the right to comment on the case and his presence will not be considered in the formal quorum of the meeting and decision.
Article 32- The reasons for rejecting the members of the board of directors, as described in paragraphs 1 to 3 of Article 30, also include the investigators. If there is one of the reasons for the rejection, the investigator must notify the head of the violations department, in which case the case will be referred to another investigator.
Article 33- If one of the reasons for rejecting the subject of Article 30 includes the head of the Office for Investigation of Violations, then the preparation of the final report of the case by the CEO shall be referred to one of the investigators other than the investigator of the case.
Article 34- If the reasons for rejection occur after the beginning of the investigation or investigation, action will be taken in accordance with Articles 31, 32 and 33.
Mahmoud Reza Khajeh Nasiri (Vice Chairman of the Board)
Vahid Rajabian (Member of the Board)
Ali Sahraei (Managing Director)