The Kremlin was thrown … Africans
At the “African summit,” Putin was reproached for breaking the “grain deal” and asked to return everything as it was.
Egypt slammed the door, especially loudly.
It’s about 3 things:
- 1. A grain deal for Africa is a “convention”: Africa needed and will need cheap wheat, which the Russian Federation does not provide in the right volumes at the right price, and the absence of cheap wheat is a new “spring” (but this time purely African ), therefore, against the backdrop of military coups, the people’s revolutionaries will also pull the power, and all this under the cutting of zones of influence and political interests. Literally before our eyes, as a result of a military coup in one of the African republics, France remains with a problematic nuclear power plant.
- 2. For Russia, the “grain deal” is a pretext to bring its “products” to Africa through controlled states, and from there, by washing out the schemes through the “wires” organized by Prigozhin, all over the world – at an increased price. So the Kremlin wants to do “dark business” of the entire food industry.
- 3. Ukraine has lost quite a substantial economic substratum. Of course, trade routes will be restored through the new “knee”, but this will cause some pause, the amount of which will be significant, and this is especially important given the absolutely vile position of Hungary.
But the signal was sent – even those who embrace the Kremlin terrorists, dress up in T-shirts with the face of an international criminal and are controlled by the power structures of the “Wagnerian bayonets”, are not ready to play unipolarity, refusing grain, in exchange for Russian schemes.
And the Kremlin offered to stir up schemes through Africa (that’s why Prigozhin circulated at the summit, telling everyone his business plan), but stirring up schemes in the face of food riots is a difficult task: it is better to turn schemes in the presence of well-fed rebels.
So the summit as the idea of a “window to strike out the grain deal” failed.
