The list of targets for guerrilla attacks is an obvious list of structures of Putin’s fascism.
About politics
The moratorium is still in place – political discussions are prohibited until the fall of the Putin regime. The enemy of my enemy is my ally. Alliance is not love to the grave and not blood fraternization, it is joint actions to achieve a common goal.
In our consolidated opinion, it is not political preferences that are important, but institutions that allow conflicts to be resolved through discussion, and not mutual extermination, so formally we do not violate the moratorium with this post. To what people reasonably agree, then it will be. Their decision, they reap the rewards. Here are our proposals for future Constitutions and Declarations .
1. The right to rebel
Citizens, as a source of power, should have the right to destroy a worthless ruler and the ruling regime. The right must be not only codified, but also reinforced by the possession of weapons, as well as the conscious decision of citizens. It is not necessary to implement on every occasion, but it should be.
Pay attention – not “people”, “population”, “what was born as it turned out”, but citizens.
2. Civil Court
Judges on a salary, experts in laws and minutes of meetings, let them be, but citizens should have the right and opportunity to consider any court cases by a court of the same capable citizens. In the case of a civil court, the role of the judge is completely excluded, the task of the judiciary is reduced to taking minutes of the meeting and the decision, or it is also completely excluded, the decision is entrusted to a jury or something like that. Is it obligatory to convene such a court, to execute the decision by the state? See “right to rebel”.
3. Legal capacity
Legal capacity and citizenship should be a conscious, purposeful choice, following the maxim “rights are not given, but taken and protected by force.” A candidate must pass a test (perhaps more than one) before being recognized as a capable citizen. It is clear that this will not be a revolution in a third world country, but some model situation, perhaps a discussion with a set of moral and ethical dilemmas that the candidate must not answer correctly, as in an exam, but survive, feel and make a conscious decision.
Now it is customary to distribute to everyone the rights for which previous generations fought, shed blood, lost their freedom and life. That is why the new generations are literally flushing these rights down the drain (whoever has them), selling their vote in elections for a food package, because “the bosses have asked menacingly” or for unsubstantiated promises. Anyone who has reached the age of 18 is considered capable. And why does criminal responsibility begin at 14, you can get married at 16, but you can vote, drive a car, own and carry civilian weapons, serve in the army from 18? Why not from the age of 14.5 or from the 81st year? For no reason, because a load of cocaine reached the State Duma of the Russian Federation with vodka by diplomatic mail, and the “population” is not against it, because the rights were given for free. We are seeing the result in Russia2022.
4. Citizens’ money should be free from the control of states and central banks
Money of a healthy person is a decentralized cryptocurrency in which the authenticity of a payment is confirmed by public consensus and stored in a distributed ledger.
Governments and central banks are not really up to the task of “providing stability” or counteracting illegal financial transactions, tasks that justify the right to implement monetary policy and control financial transactions. A citizen has every right not to show or explain his income and expenses to anyone. Want to be accused of a crime? Prove the crime, don’t make it up by outlawing financial transactions that you can’t get a percentage of.
It is time to start not repeating the mistakes of history, but to learn from them.
There are no personalities, nothing personal, not specific names, but functions and structures. Not “Vasya BMW kebabs”, but “FSB Captain Vasily Kh.”, for example. He may be called Ilya or Akakiy (if he reads this post). What is important is not a specific person, but the role and function in the system.
On the other hand, personal revenge is a common motivation for action. The victims of iniquity want justice and vengeance. Someone was beaten after being detained at an anti-war rally, another had their door cut down with a search at six in the morning, a third was sewn up with a case from statements made on Vkontakte. You can take justice and the “hammers” into your own hands, burn down the car of a criminal in uniform as a fine for illegal detention, for example, but the motive of personal revenge can lead Putin’s punishers to the author of the action. Therefore, we dissuade from actions out of personal revenge.
You can avoid deanon for personal reasons if you “give” your goal to someone. In a similar vein, justice operates in a normal society – you do not investigate the case yourself, make a court decision and close the offender to prison, this is done by a “third party” that does not have a personal interest in the case, but has the ability to protect violated rights and restore justice.
And now we return from the world of abstract reasoning to Putin’s Russia, where the “law enforcement” system protects criminals, and the victims are judged and imprisoned.
We have four proposals for fundamental ideas to be included in the constitutions of the post-Russian states: the right to rebellion, a civil court, legal capacity, free money of citizens. In fact, we have been using three of them for a long time, and the time has come to realize the right to a court.
Considering Putin’s functionaries personally is a huge job for which we have neither the desire nor the resources. But by the way, independently of us, Svobodnaya Chuvashia has created a private court in Kebe and is already considering the cases of the FSB officers.
The idea and principle of the court are described here.
Private courts of Libertarian Chuvashia-Volga Bulgaria
Mikhail OreshnikovApril 12, 2023
Algorithm
When a number of international organizations and countries of the Western world recognized the Russian Federation as a terrorist state, and The Hague issued an arrest warrant for the head of this terrorist entity, a legal incident arose.
It turns out that the “courts” of the Russian Federation are subordinate to a terrorist group and carry out acts of terror when they pass sentences for freedom of expression and kidnap a person for 5-20 years. consequently, there are no bodies exercising justice in the Russian Federation, and there is no law as such.
And what happens where there is no law? A natural right arises, namely: ” the right to protect and self-defense oneself and private property from violence by other people and the state and the right to freely dispose of one’s personality and private property .”
The provisional government in exile of Chuvashia-Volga Bulgaria took advantage of this right and explained why private courts could now operate on its territory. So the first private court “Kebe” appeared on the territory of the Chuvash State .
He was contacted by the plaintiff Aleksey Mironov, who was kidnapped by terrorists for a year and 3 months for posting on a social network. The collegium of the court was formed from the diplomatic representatives of Karelia , Bjarmia , as well as the leader of the OVOD “Freedom and Freedom” partisan organization and the Ukrainian lawyer-blogger Yevpat Knur .
The Kebe Court ruled that the kidnapping was a violation of the right to control one’s identity, determined the list of perpetrators and ordered payment of compensation and a demand to stop terrorist activities. Otherwise, it will be necessary to neutralize the terrorists in order to protect innocent people from them.
At the same time, the court asked to use the most humane possible methods of neutralization, ideally house arrest. The trial will be presented as a tool to fairly determine the guilt of terror and genocide of various criminals who run the terrorist regime of the Russian Federation at the Post-Rf Free Peoples Forum , which will be held in the United States at the end of April.
After all, it allows you to avoid chaotic violence in the transition period. Also, the court will be presented to Ukraine as a tool that will allow all war criminals and persons involved in the genocide in Ukraine to be held accountable.
For guerrilla movements, private courts will be presented as a tool that allows them to carry out justice while remaining in the legal field. In fact, to conduct a counter-terrorist operation with a fair analysis of each crime.
All in all, it’s a great tool to help all parties reach fair decisions, help people protect their rights and freedoms, and bring terrorists to justice.
We see interaction like this:
- 1. Desiring justice and vengeance transmits information to the Kebe court. It can be any case, not necessarily related to Chuvashia.
- 2. The court considers the case at a public meeting (they can afford publicity), formulates and publishes a decision, a verdict.
- 3. Any “actionist” who wishes, relying on the decision of the Kebe court and the support of the Black Bridge, can carry out the sentence. This can be either a fine in the form of the destruction of the property of the sentenced or house arrest in the form of a front door filled with glue, or the liquidation of the functionary personally.
- – Data on the sentenced are published in a closed channel.
- – With applications to the Kebe court, contact the official contact of Free Chuvashia in the channel description.
- PS We suggest that the court of Kebe introduce into the process the “devil’s advocate” – the role of defending the accused and obliged to interpret any facts and doubts in his favor.
